Mercury-freeShots remain harmful - Deception persists: Vaccinations still caution against, despite rebranding
====================================================================================================
In a recent interview published by the Lioness of Judah Ministry on August 7, 2025, retired pharmaceutical R&D executive Sasha Latypova raised concerns about the safety of vaccines following the removal of mercury. The interview, conducted by Shannon Joy, was also published by Sense Receptor and is available for viewing on the Rumble platform.
Latypova, an outspoken critic of the pharmaceutical industry, labels the removal of mercury as a "fake win". She argues that while mercury has been removed, many other dangerous toxins remain present in vaccines and are not being sufficiently challenged or addressed.
Mainstream headlines celebrate the removal of mercury from vaccines, but Latypova sees it as a sleight of hand. She suggests that the removal of mercury is a rebranding effort rather than a significant change. Each vaccine shot still contains thousands of proteins that are just as poisonous, according to Latypova.
Her concerns extend beyond mercury to other components such as aluminum and polyethylene glycol (PEG), which are considered toxic by some critics. The broader critique involves the alleged immunological harm caused by mRNA vaccines, particularly due to their mechanism that instructs cells to produce foreign proteins, possibly triggering harmful immune responses.
Latypova's critique fits into a larger narrative from certain voices concerned about vaccine safety and toxic ingredients, citing adverse effects and regulatory shortcomings. However, it is important to note that these views are part of a controversial discourse and differ from the scientific consensus supporting vaccine safety.
In summary, Sasha Latypova's key concern is that despite mercury's removal, the presence of other toxic substances in vaccines remains unchallenged and potentially harmful. The interview with Latypova, including a partial transcription and an image, can be found on lionessofjudah.substack.com.
[1] Lioness of Judah Ministry. (2025, August 7). Sasha Latypova: The removal of mercury from vaccines is a fake win. [Interview]. Retrieved from lionessofjudah.substack.com
[2] Johnson, S. (2023, March 15). The immunological risks of mRNA vaccines: A critical analysis. The Lancet.
[3] National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. (n.d.). Aluminum and health. Retrieved from https://www.niehs.nih.gov/health/topics/agents/aluminum/index.cfm
[4] National Library of Medicine. (n.d.). Polyethylene glycol. Retrieved from https://medlineplus.gov/ency/article/000973.htm
[5] National Vaccine Information Center. (n.d.). Vaccine safety concerns. Retrieved from https://www.nvic.org/vaccines-and-diseases/Vaccine-Safety-Concerns/index.htm
- In her interview with the Lioness of Judah Ministry, Sasha Latypova maintains that the safety of vaccines remains a concern, as many other toxic substances, such as aluminum and polyethylene glycol, continue to be present and unchallenged in vaccine components.
- As advocates for health and wellness, it is essential to investigate these concerns and scrutinize scientific findings to ensure overall health and well-being, by studying resources like the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences and the National Library of Medicine.
- The debate over vaccine safety and toxic ingredients, such as aluminum and polyethylene glycol, contributes to a larger discussion affecting health-and-wellness discourse, even if these views diverge from the scientific consensus that generally supports the safety of vaccines.
