Skip to content

Court Rules Commission Failed to Meet Obligations Stipulated in Article 85 (1) of the Treaty

Dispute with Administrative Bodies in Social and Economic Committees is on the Rise

Uncooperative actions against leadership in economic and social boards are on the rise.
Uncooperative actions against leadership in economic and social boards are on the rise.

Court Rules Commission Failed to Meet Obligations Stipulated in Article 85 (1) of the Treaty

Revised Article:

In the cutthroat world of employment, the question of when workers find themselves in perilous work conditions has surfaced in a Paris court, during a hearing on June 10, 2025. The dispute was between the management and employee representatives of the consumer association UFC-Que Choisir, over a request for an evaluation of psychosocial risks (RPS). This request was made in December 2024, by the elected members of the social and economic committee (CSE).

As per the French Labor Code, the CSE can tap an accredited expert organization to scrutinize the establishment, when there's a glaring, present, and recognized risk, whether disclosed or hidden, that doesn’t stem from a work accident, professional disease, or something of a professional nature.

During the harsh winter of 2024-2025, the CSE of UFC-Que Choisir determined that urgent action was necessary, considering the distress shown by employees of the political action department, which has 25 members. The CSE members voted to enlist an expertise firm to diagnose the issue and offer suggestions to prevent the situation from worsening. However, the association claimed that the "serious risk" was not established, and contested the request's legitimacy in court.

The remaining percentage of the article concerns specifics that expand on the nuances of the mentioned factors, such as workplace safety obligations, the impact of psychological risks like harassment and burnout, discrimination and harassment provisions, occupational risks, and mandatory legal and regulatory compliance.

In essence, France follows a broad approach to ensure workplace safety and protect employees from a multitude of perils. Employers are mandated to guarantee the safety and health of their employees, adhere to various labor laws, and acknowledge the increasingly significant role of psychological risks and discrimination.

  1. The dispute over the need for a psychosocial risk evaluation, initially requested by UFC-Que Choisir's social and economic committee in December 2024, highlighted the growing importance of mental health in the science of workplace-wellness and health-and-wellness, as the committee sought to address rising psychological risks among employees.
  2. As France prioritizes the protection of employees, it demonstrates a commitment to fostering a safe and healthy workplace environment, considering not just physical hazards but also psychological risks such as harassment, burnout, and discrimination, which have become integral components of the science of workplace-wellness and mental-health.

Read also:

    Latest