Authorities in Turkmenistan take controversial steps in enforcing moral codes

Authorities in Turkmenistan take controversial steps in enforcing moral codes

Unbridled Invasiveness: The Sordid Saga of Virginity Testing in Turkmenistan

Let's examination the appalling practice of compulsory virginity testing in Turkmenistan, a controversy marred by violations of individual rights and ineffectiveness in determining sexual activity.

In the seaside province of Balkan, local authorities are compelling female high school students to undergo invasive gynecological exams without the approval of parents or guardians. Officers justify the tests on the pretense of upholding "morality," reporting those deemed to be sexually active to Interior Ministry officials and the National Security Ministry.

This gruesome procedure isn't novel to Turkmenistan. In other provinces like Mary and Dashagouz, officials have taken to moral crusades in recent years.

The ethical repercussions of such government intervention aside, the emotional distress and humiliation inflicted on young girls demand attention. Moreover, medical evidence reinforces the fact that "virginity is not an anatomical feature." In other words, any effort to determine a woman's sexual history via a gynecological examination is flawed from the outset.

In 2019, a comprehensive analysis, The little tissue that couldn't - dispelling myths about the hymen's role in determining sexual history and assault, detailed the faulty methods employed by Turkmen authorities to assess morality. The hymen, a membranous tissue that surrounds the vaginal opening, does not fully cover it in most cases. It may be imperforate in only 1 out of 1,000 female births, a medical condition that can potentially cause health complications, but such instances are extremely rare.

The tests being administered by Turkmen authorities to supposedly confirm virginity are based on the notion of an "intact hymen." However, the hymen is not typically intact, and its shape, elasticity, thickness, and size vary. Therefore, the very foundation of these exams is flawed.

Researchers in the reproductive health field have established that a hymen examination is neither accurate nor reliable in determining a history of sexual activity, including sexual assault. One study of adolescent sexual assault victims showed that only 19% of sexually assaulted girls aged 14 to 19 without prior sexual experience had acute hymenal tears. Another study of 132 women with no prior sexual experience demonstrated that only 9.1% had hymenal perforation after sexual assault.

An international study of 1,500 sexually abused girls aged 0-17 showed that only 7% had diagnostic findings, leaving 93% with unremarkable genital examinations. These findings unequivocally expose the unreliability of virginity testing or hymen examination as a means of determining an individual's sexual history or assessing rape claims.

In a conservative, patriarchal society like Turkmenistan, the consequences of being labeled as "non-virgin" or "immoral" can be devastating, ranging from social ostracization to suicide and honor killings. While pinpointing the exact impact on mental health and emotional well-being is difficult, it's undeniable that these tests wield immense power to shatter lives.

Another crucial matter to ponder is the competency of Turkmen public health officials administering these tests. The underfunding of the Turkmen public health system raises questions about the qualifications and training of gynecologists responsible for making life-altering judgments.

For instance, in the United States, medical students have limited opportunities to learn about the hymen, with only a few hours of pelvic examination training. In one study, only 64% of 139 pediatric chief residents could correctly identify the hymen on photographs of pre-pubescent female genitalia.

The policing of female sexual behavior in Central Asia stretches beyond Turkmenistan, affecting countries like Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, and Kazakhstan. While virginity tests are commonly administered to brides-to-be in Tajikistan and catcalls for such practices have been reported in Uzbekistan, no evidence of government-mandated testing exists in recent reports. Kazakhstan, however, has not been associated with virginity testing in its focus on economic development and social reforms.

So, the question arises: what does it say about the morality of a government that insists on upholding the morality of underage girls through such invasive, inaccurate, and traumatic means, while ignoring fundamental human rights and the well-being of those very girls it seeks to protect?

1. The controversy over compulsory virginity testing in Turkmenistan, rooted in individual rights violations and ineffectiveness in determining sexual activity, has sparked international concern.
2. In addition to Balkan, provinces like Mary and Dashagouz have seen officials conducting moral crusades, raising questions about the ethics of government intervention in matters of sexual health.
3. Research articulated in the 2019 analysis, The little tissue that couldn't - dispelling myths about the hymen's role in determining sexual history and assault, revealed the flawed methods used by Turkmen authorities to assess morality.
4. Despite the crude assumption of an "intact hymen" as the basis for these tests, researchers in the reproductive health field have consistently demonstrated that a hymen examination is neither accurate nor reliable in determining sexual history.
5. This misguided practice has grave implications for mental health and emotional well-being in a conservative, patriarchal society like Turkmenistan, where being labeled as "non-virgin" or "immoral" can lead to social ostracization, suicide, and honor killings.
6. The policing of female sexual behavior in neighboring Central Asian countries, such as Tajikistan and Uzbekistan, also raises concerns about human rights and the well-being of girls subjected to these archaic practices.

Read also: